LIONS FOR LAMBS

RATING 3

(Director: Robert Redford, R, 88 min)

Senator Jasper Irving (Tom Cruise) has an agenda a strategy for winning in the Middle East; send small troops of Army Rangers to isolated points in Afghanistan and they can eliminate the insurgents from a superior vantage point. He’s going to need to sell this concept to the American public so he invites seasoned journalist, Janine Roth (Meryl Streep) to do an exclusive interview. The only problem will be if she doesn’t run the story.

The military exercise is happening at the same time as their conversation so you get to see the implementation and how it doesn’t go like it was stated in the comfort of a Washington office. Ernest (Michael Peña) and Arian (Derek Luke) are separated from their squad during the mission. Will these brave men come out with their beliefs and bodies intact?

Meanwhile on a California campus Professor Malley (Robert Redford) is trying to get through to his brightest Poly Sci student, Todd (Andrew Garfield). He is talking of passion, making a difference and apathy – will he inspire this young thinker to do the right thing?

Talking heads pontificating could have been the subtitle for this script, the actors deliver their lines powerfully but you are not left with a powerful film. We think we found the reason when we located this (Possible) Excerpt from script...

Senator: This is my point of view, I am going to tell you my POV in a really compelling way, you’ll hardly see the spin as I masterfully paint a picture with words, I may use too many words and that might actually be the downfall of my diatribe – if I repeat a concept over and over again do you think you might see the holes in the logic?

Journalist Lady: Well, let me tell my counterpoint, I sat politely and nodded a lot while you waxed poetic but let me tell my side as the righteous truth I know it to be. I may accuse you of selling your propaganda but I will give mine away for free (that makes mine nobler).

Director’s note: Do you think we should include some dramatic action or can we get away with less staging than a two-man play directed by a novice? If we include action it should be as static as possible. The lighting guy has the one camera set up perfect and he doesn’t want to get bogged down in moving it around.

Let’s have a rallying tagline like: If you don't STAND for something, you might FALL for anything. Apparently they are counting on the audience falling for the "star power".


Home

 

Movie Chick Leigh Ann:
"Not a lot of entertainment with this edification. It's thought-provoking, but so's CNN – 3."